Mainstream Blackout on Obama Crimes: March to Washington 2010


Stephanie Sledge

TheGovernmentRag

10/19/2010

Mainstream Blackout on Obama Crimes:  Americans Greatest March to Washington 2010

As evidence mounts against President Obama/aka Barry Soetoro/aka Saebarkah, Americans are growing more unrest over his true identity of what millions of citizens believe to be that of a modern-day con man. As more cover-ups continue on the governmental front, the sleeping giant of American people are marching to Washington, D.C., October 23, 2010 to expose this new evidence to the world. It all started with Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Obama challenging his lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States. Like a Halloween hunt, clues surfaced over Obama’s real birth certificate origins which could determine who this man really is and alleged ties to the establishment. As American’s find out more and more lies and cover-ups being exposed to the public, the mainstream remains silent over the Obama crimes issue.

In an immediate release by ObamaCrimes, the hunt for the truth has also exposed an alleged cover up questioning motives behind the State of Hawaii’s involvement in suppressing evidence and questions why one man is so important that Hawaii is willing to commit Misprision of Felony for him.

“Hawaii is covering this up for political reasons to protect Obama. Only they know the ultimate reasons they are all willing to commit Misprision of Felony at this point in time given the mounting evidence that Obama was not physically born in Hawaii. Obama may have amended his record since 1961 to try to reinforce and cover up the original fraudulent filing. But his online COLB clearly shows that when it was FILED it was never finally ACCEPTED. This is a national disgrace that our entire system of laws including the Constitution and all legal records are being subverted and subordinated to cover up for Obama’s continued fraud on the nation as to his true legal identity. What is so important about this one man that Hawaii is willing to see the nation destroyed by his corruption and lies from birth by his family and continued on all his life by Obama. The man is a grifter and conman.”

The March takes place on September 23, 2010 at the U.S. Capital on the West Front. Thousands of Americans are due to stand up and demand exposure to what some believe to be the greatest National Security threat America faces today and questions whether or not our government is being run by a con, a fake, a phony.  In a video by Philip J. Berg, he gives an overview of alleged evidence that is mounting against Obama and the reasons for the mass march to Washington.

Read More about the March to Washington over Obama’s Crimes

Video Courtesy of SpotLightSoundBite
Advertisements

Confirmed: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Kidnap Baby


 

Stewart Rhodes

October 11th, 2010

CONFIRMED: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby

Oath-keeper-patchThere has been some confusion about this case, leading some commentators to believe that the reference to John Irish’s “association” with Oath Keepers was in some other document, rather than in the affidavit relied on by the Court’s Order.  Alex Jones’ site, in an effort to protect the privacy of the family, posted excerpts from two different documents, leading some to question where the reference actually was.

To clear that up, below you will find an embedded PDF which contains the full (though redacted) versions of the following documents:  the two Petitions (one pertaining to each parent), the Court’s Ex Parte Order, the  Affidavit of Dana Bickford which was attached, the Motion for Change of Venue, and lastly, the Notice to Accused Parent, explaining the legal process.   We have highlighted in yellow all text where the Petitions or the Court Order refers to the Affidavit which contains reference to Oath Keepers.

By looking at the below documents, you will be able to see from the two Petitions, the Order, and Affidavit item #7, in that order, that:

1.  Both Petitions state:  “7. Details or Details or facts of abuse/neglect (attach separate sheet if necessary):  See affidavit filed with the Concord Family Court.”

2.  The Court’s Ex Parte Order states:

“Findings of Fact:

There is reasonable cause to believe that the child is in such circumstances or surroundings as would present an imminent danger to the child’s health or life, which require the immediate placement of the child for the following reasons:

See attached affidavit”

Thus, the Court’s Order does, in fact, refer to, and adopt all of the reasons given in the Affidavit as being the reasons for the order.

3.  The Attached Affidavit, referenced by the Petitions and adopted by the Court as its findings of fact, includes, at #7:  “The Division became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the, “Oath Keepers,” and had purchased several different types of weapons, including a rifle, handgun and taser.”

This is how all such petitions are done.  The same goes for a restraining order. The petition is supported by affidavit laying out the reasons, and then if the judge finds those reasons sufficient, he or she issues the order. Such orders always rely on the affidavit attached to the petition.  And in this case, the Order explicitly states that the reasons in support are listed in the “attached affidavit.”

We have posted these documents with the permission of both parents, but we redacted (blacked out) all the personal information and allegations that do not pertain to Oath Keepers or gun ownership.   This was done in part to respect the privacy of the family, including the kids.  It is out of such concerns that family court proceedings are usually closed to the public and I think it would be improper to post the entirety of the affidavit for the same reason.  If the parents choose to post a non-redacted version, they can do it themselves (we left in their address because they have given that information out in several interviews, asking for donations to their defense fund),

More to the point, we also blacked out the parts unrelated to Oath Keepers and to gun ownership because my focus in this case is on the illegitimate listing of a father’s political affiliations and his gun ownership as a reason to take his daughter away from him and also away from her mother.   That the Court relied on an affidavit that explicitly lists the father’s association with Oath Keepers to issue that order makes it important to all ten thousand dues paying members of Oath Keepers (many of them current serving police and military), and also makes it important to the estimated thirty thousand people (and growing) who have “associated” with Oath Keepers in the past, or still do, on several social media sites, such as Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, on our email alert list, in the comments section of our main site, in our free state forums, or in person at our many meetings across the country, and the many additional tens of thousands who have “associated” with us at various rallies, summits, and forums across the nation.

This use of a father’s political association and his gun ownership is also important to many other Americans who don’t even associate with Oath Keepers because what happens in this case can impact the free speech and association rights of all of us, across the nation, of whatever political or social orientation.   And that is why we must stand firm, now.

RALLY FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT!   This Thursday, October 14, Dover, NH

We will be holding a rally in support of the First Amendment protected right of freedom of association, to be held this Thursday, October 14, at the Rochester Family Division Court, 259 County Farm Rd, Dover, NH 03820-6016.  I will be there, and I am calling on all Oath Keepers, all who “associate” with us, and on all other organizations that stand for the Constitution and for liberty to be there for a peaceful gathering in support of both the due process rights of the parents (who have a hearing there, on that day), but also to stand in support of the rights of free speech and association, free from persecution, for ALL Americans.  I will post more details later today.   Please join us!

Please read the relevant sections of the documents below, and then I will have additional comments on the other side.  – Stewart Rhodes, Founder of Oath Keepers

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY STEWART:

As is clear from the documents, the reasons given to the Court in the Petitions, and the reasons adopted by the Court when it adopted the entirety of the attached Affidavit, included John Irish’s association with Oath Keepers.   Certainly it was not the only reason, nor are we even arguing that it was the principle or dominant reason (I can’t get inside the judge’s head, and unless the judge elaborates, we don’t know).

But the fact that the political association of the father with Oath Keepers, and his gun ownership, were even among the reasons given for the taking of this baby takes this case beyond the realm of your mundane family court matter and turns it into something that could affect the rights of us all, nation-wide.  Such a listing of a parent’s political associations as one of the reasons to remove a child from her parents should not happen in any case, regardless of whatever else is going on.

Relevance?

Whether it is a criminal or a civil proceeding, the political affiliations of the accused are both irrelevant and prejudicial.  For example, if I had a criminal defense client accused of beating his wife, what relevance would his NRA membership have to the question of whether he beat his wife?   And what relevance would there be if he were a Tea Party member, or belonged to a 912 group, or was a member of Rush Limbaugh fan club, or a member of Glen Beck’s “Insider Extreme” which includes a message board?   Or what if he were a member of the ACLU, or Answer, or ACORN, or Code Pink, etc.?  What relevance would any such associations have to the question of whether he assaulted his wife?   The political associations of the accused in a child endangerment case are no less irrelevant to the question of whether he or the mother are guilty or whether the child is endangered.

Prejudicial.

In addition to a relevancy problem, it would also be prejudicial for the finder(s) of fact to hear testimony on the suspect’s political association, especially when such may be with an unpopular group.  Say, for example, you have a conservative, pro-drug war jury in a theft case and the defendant turns out to be a member of NORML (which advocates legalizing marijuana).  Should the jury be able to hear evidence of that membership?  Or imagine a liberal jury, with jurors who are anti-gun.  Should the jury be able to hear evidence that the accused was an NRA member, or, perhaps even a member of the far more hardcore Gun Owners of America?  Mention of the defendant’s associations in either case would not only be irrelevant but also potentially prejudicial.  Even if some twisted argument convinced the judge to find those associations relevant, their  prejudicial effect would outweigh any such relevance.  See Rule 403, Federal Rules of Evidence.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm

Yes, it is true that in family court one does not get the same level of due process as in a criminal trial, but that only makes it a more likely system to be abused to target political undesirables.  The lower the threshold of due process protection, the more ripe it is for arbitrary abuse.

The Chilling Effect: Making People Afraid to Speak Out and Associate

And in this case the problem is not just a possible violation of the due process rights of these particular parents, but also the very real chilling effect this case will have not just on their speech but also on the free speech of potentially millions of other American parents who will, if this is allowed to stand, thereafter have to worry that their political affiliations will be listed among the reasons for taking their children in some future run-in with CPS.

A law or government practice that targets people for their speech and association, based on the content of their speech, or that MAY be used in such a way, is unconstitutional and harms not just that individual, but also all others who thereafter are “chilled” or dissuaded from engaging in similar speech or associations.

The chilling works even if it is rarely applied since just the knowledge that it can be done will chill speech and association.  All the government needs to do is make an example out of one person, and others will refrain from sticking their necks out.

If it can be done to someone who is “associated” with Oath Keepers just by posting on an open social networking site (In this case John Irish was not even a dues paying member, but merely a forum user on the Oath Keepers Ning forum system, which was open to the general public to “join” for free, even on a whim) then it can happen to anyone from any group which particular authorities may look down upon.

Let’s flip the political paradigm:  Imagine the same thing being done in a case involving members of PETA, Earth First, or the Anti-War Committee (AWC) which recently had their homes and offices raided by the FBI.  Would it be acceptable for Child Protective Services to list those affiliations when investigating potential child abuse or neglect, or would that be both irrelevant, and prejudicial?  And would it not also chill free speech, making people afraid to join those groups?

Think back to how the very arbitrary “no-fly list” was used by the Bush Administration to punish critics and political opposition, including journalists.  Such power is always subject to abuse.  And especially so when the list is secret, and the criteria used to put you on it is secret.  Talk about arbitrary power! But even there, it was not openly and honestly used to target people because of their political associations. That was the wink, wink, nudge, nudge, we all knew was happening, but the Bush Admin knew better than to state it publicly.  But it still had a chilling effect (as was likely intended), because we all knew what was really going on when some journalist critic of the President just happened to make the list.

In this case, it is openly acknowledged that the political association of the father is one of the reasons for taking the child (again, the Court’s Order adopted the entire affidavit as its findings of facts).  Ditto for his perfectly legal gun ownership.  Over half the people in this nation own guns.  Imagine the chilling effect on them.

You Defend the Constitution for Everyone, Regardless of Innocence or Guilt, Regardless of Virtue or Vice

One last point: Too many people are asking “but did he do it.”  In constitutional law, what counts is not whether the particular defendant was an angel or a “dirtbag” – whether he is innocent or committed the underlying offense at issue.  What counts is whether the Constitution is protected.

For example, Ernesto Miranda was suspected of kidnapping and raping of an 18-year-old girl. Because of the Supreme Court ruling, which ruled his confession inadmissible, his first conviction was overturned.  But then the case was retried, leaving out the tainted confession, and Miranda was convicted and served 20 years.  A dirtbag?  You bet.  He was a filthy rapist. Guilty?  Yes, so found by a jury of his peers.  He raped the girl and was rightfully convicted and locked up.  But it was still wrong to coerce his confession, and his case gave us the procedural protection of our “Miranda” rights, which helps to give meaningful effect to our right to remain silent and to not incriminate ourselves, as well as our right to have counsel present at questioning.

The same goes for the case of Jose Padilla, the alleged “Chicago dirty bomber.”  A dirtbag?  Likely.  He as both a former gang member and liked to hang out with Al Qaeda types.  But that still did not make it OK to black bag him with no due process and throw him in a military brig on secret evidence, without indictment, without a lawyer, without a jury trial, for over two years.  That was unconstitutional even if he “did it.” (he was later convicted in a jury trial of aiding Al Qaeda).  Even though a dirtbag, he still had procedural rights that were violated, and those violations set a dangerous precedent for the rest of us. Now, according to the Fourth Circuit (who’s decision still stands as “good law”), that can be done to any of us.   What happens even to “bad guys” can and will affect our rights too.  Rules of due process and protections of free speech and association apply to EVERYONE, not just those who are pure as the driven snow.

Sadly, so dumbed down is the average American that many just cannot grasp these elemental concepts.  In this case, they ask whether the parents are “guilty,” as if that would make it OK to list their political associations or gun owner status as evidence of why they are unfit parents.  If people cannot understand why this cannot be allowed to happen, then how can we restore our Republic?   That is why, regardless of whether the parents are guilty of any of the alleged abuse; the listing of their association with Oath Keepers is illegitimate and must be fought.  And it will.

We Oath Keepers and our many allies will fight this regardless of the supposed validity of the other allegations against the parents.  This use of political associations as evidence is wrong in every case, and in any case.  It is the “weaponization” of CPS – turning it into a weapon against political undesirables.  And that weapon will be used to silence and suppress those who might otherwise speak out, and to silence and suppress those who already have spoken out.  It will thus chill speech even when not used (just by the implied threat that you may be paid a visit by CPS if you get “uppity”), and it will punish speech when used against dissidents who still dare to speak out.

Either you defend the Constitution for everyone, or we may as well just scrap it and let government agencies and judges do whatever they want to those they deem bad, using whatever arbitrary “reasons” they want, like in some third world junta.   The choice is yours.  I hope to see you in New Hampshire, the “Live Free or Die” state on Thursday.

Stewart Rhodes

Breaking News: Government Instructing CPS Workers to Kidnap Kids from Oath Keeper Members


Stephanie Sledge

TheGovernmentRag

10/8/2010

Government Instructing CPS Workers to Kidnap Kids from Oath Keeper Members

Americans are growing weary of more governmental radical insanity when this week, John Irish and Stephanie Janvrin had their newborn baby kidnapped from the hospital by New Hampshire Division of Family Child Services, with the help of law enforcement, after citing the parents association with the Oath Keepers organization being the main reason for the snatch-and-grab.  After being lied to and lured into a trap by a hospital nurse, the baby was snatched away from the parents because of their political beliefs. This new precedent screams to the American people who if you are involved in exercising free speech and support the Constitution, the kidnappers are coming for your children and you will be charged with child abuse.

Like a scene out of a horror movie, the parents were tricked when John and Stephanie were told by the Director of Security and the Head Nurse at Concord Hospital that their newborn was going to be taken to the hospital pediatrician to be checked out. They were lied to and deceived under false pretenses and without choice as their baby was turned over to the kidnappers. The baby was then wheeled out in a bassinet as the father was forced to stand up and get patted down. The parents were then told they were taking the baby because they found out that he has association with a group known as the Oath Keepers – a network of current military and law enforcement professionals who have sworn not to obey unconstitutional orders such as gun confiscation, warrantless searches, and mass internment of Americans. In an article by Paul Joseph Watson, John Irish explains the nightmare as they stole his child away…

“They forced me to stand up, held my hands behind my back and patted me down,” said Irish, before police told him they were taking the baby. “My fiancé didn’t even get any time to bond with the baby – they came in and stole our child,” said Irish. The parents were given a couple of minutes with their daughter before being forced by police to leave the hospital. Irish was subsequently told that a “security officer” would follow his every move. The affidavit in support of the decision to take the child, which has been verified by Oath Keepers, states, “The Division became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the Oath Keepers,” confirming that political beliefs were, amongst other reasons, one of the primary factors behind the snatching of the baby. Even if the additional reasons cited in the affidavit, which are unproven at this time, could be considered sufficient reason for the state to take the baby, the fact that political affiliations were even mentioned is a frightening indictment of how far the government’s war on Americans who dissent against authority has advanced. “Regardless of the other allegations, it is utterly unconstitutional for government agencies to list Mr. Irish’s association with Oath Keepers in an affidavit in support of a child abuse order to remove his daughter from his custody.” writes Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes. “Talk about chilling speech! If this is allowed to continue, it will chill the speech of not just Mr. Irish, but all Oath Keepers and it will serve as the camel under the tent for other associations being considered too risky for parents to dare. Thus, it serves to chill the speech of all of us, in any group we belong to that “officials” may not approve of. Don’t you dare associate with such and such group, or you could be on “the list” and then child protective services might come take your kids.” The parents were not even full members of the Oath Keepers organization, they were merely on a discussion list related to the group. This makes the case even more shocking – you don’t even have to be directly associated with a group that the government deems to be a “militia” to have your baby stolen – you merely have to be involved in online discussions of issues relating to the constitution and freedom in America. Irish’s own web page clearly states that he supports a “NON-violent, law abiding gathering of like minded Patriots,” and that he is “AGAINST ANY acts of violence or illegal activity.”  “The Sons of Liberty Riders does not endorse or tolerate radical, extreme, violent or racial postings,” states the website. The Oath Keepers organization is not a “militia,” as the affidavit claims, it is merely a loose network of current and former military and law enforcement professionals who have sworn not to obey unconstitutional orders such as gun confiscation, warrantless searches and mass internment of Americans. The group is committed to non-violence. If this case is allowed to stand it opens up a hellish future for free speech and political discourse in America. If parents live in fear of having their children stolen by the state because they criticize the government, the United States can rank itself amongst the worst dictatorships in history who invoked the threat of taking people’s children if they spoke out against tyranny. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes has announced that a legal defense fund will be created to help Irish, and that the organization, “will actively pursue aggressive legal remedy and redress.” “We will assist in locating competent local legal counsel in New Hampshire and additional expert legal counsel from around the country in First Amendment and child custody law,” wrote Stewart on the Oath Keepers website. “There can be no freedom of speech, no freedom of association, no freedom to even open your mouth and “speak truth to power,” no freedom AT ALL, if your children can be black bagged and stolen from you because of your political speech and associations — because you simply dare to express your love of country, and dare to express your solidarity and fellowship with other citizens and with active duty and retired military and police who simply pledge to honor their oath and obey the Constitution. It was to prevent just such outrageous content based persecution of political dissidents that our First Amendment was written.”

Watch the video below by Independent Journalist  George Hemminger in which John Irish describes what happened in an exclusive phone interview:

Founder of Oath Keepers Stewart Rhodes discusses what the organization is about

Read Entire Article by Prison Planet

Video via george4title

Image provided by flickr

Sending Your Kids to School is Becoming a Living Hell


Stephanie Sledge
TheGovernmentRag
10/3/2010

Sending Your Kids to Public School is Becoming a Living Hell

Parents in America are waking up to more unconstitutional public school policy that now says if you want to participate in your children’s education or visit, you must first submit to an extensive background check without a search warrant. Over 3500 Texas public schools and over 7000 nationwide have implemented policy that forces parents to submit to the school system snooping around with the help of law enforcement without a warrant to search your personal records including arrest records, Administration Office records, Dept of Corrections, Superior Court records, Municipal Court, County Court, District Court, and Common Pleas. What was once a place to send your children to learn, grow, and be creative is now becoming what many parents are viewing as being “a living hell.”

In an article by Infowars, “This check is carried out by a company called Raptor, which summarizes their services as: Thousands of schools and community facilities across the country use Raptor’s V-soft visitor management and screening technology to help protect children from sex offenders, domestic dispute offenders and other trespassers. V-soft works in conjunction with law enforcement to add an extra layer of security and keep our kids safe.

While the mission of protecting children from sex offenders has a broad appeal, domestic dispute charges include a broad range of situations including issues as minor as loud arguments among siblings. A definition of domestic dispute from USLegal.com describes the term as including non-crimes:

A domestic dispute is generally any quarrel, which may or may not include violence, within a family or between members of the same household. Definitions are governed by local laws, which vary, and may also cover including any child or an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant or person with whom a suspect has had a child or has or has had a dating or engagement relationship. It may or may not include criminal behavior. Local laws should be consulted for specific requirements in your area.

According to Raptor, their background check includes arrest records, which doesn’t indicate conviction or acquittal indicating that the notion of being innocent until proven guilty does not apply here.”

As more school systems implement prison type policies using “safety” as a reason to harass and snoop through parents lives, parents all over America are growing weary of the policies the public school system have imposed on parents. As more people demand more security and regulation in the school systems, the trade-off is resulting in more governmental and law enforcement control over our lives including our own children.

Picture by LATimes

Ahmadinejad Blames US for 9/11 Attacks; US acts like First they Heard of these Claims


Stephanie Sledge

TheGovernmentRag

9/24/2010

Ahmadinejad Blames US for 9/11 Attacks; US Acts like First They Heard of these Claims

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran, spoke at the United Nations on Thursday expressing his opinion that the US is behind the 9/11 attacks in New York causing a dramatic outburst by the Americans, British, and many European delegations to walk out acting as if this was the first they heard about these claims while using Ahmadinejad as a scapegoat.  This year, as another post 9/11 arrived, the world was awakened when Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth held a press conference and mock debate at the National Press Club in Washington DC while hand-delivering a petition to Congress Members that has over 1250 professional Architects & Engineers alarmed at the astounding hard evidence that all three WTC  skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, in NYC were destroyed by explosive controlled demolition. Hundred of thousands of citizens took part in peaceful protests nationwide to seek the truth this passing of September 11, 2010.

As Ahmadinejad delivered his speech at the UN, he started his speech claiming love and justice as he wished mankind prosperity and for man to spread knowledge and truth while refraining from egoism and dishonesty. He also spoke of how the Western man has been lost and reduced by the materialistic world and is lost from human nature and truth. He spoke of how the destructive struggle for survival and domination have corrupted the Ego and gave way to enslavement and domination by a few Western States. He claims that 10’s of millions of people are taken by this domination prevailing and that the slave masters orchestrated the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Building 7 to put fear into the world. He claims that this event was a ploy to put military action in Iraq & Afghanistan. “It was carried out by a terrorist group and American officials participated and knew about the attacks while mapping out a rational route to take against them by launching a massive war that has murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent people,” the Iranian president explains. He goes on to say that there was not a proper investigation of  9/11 and the evil people behind the dominant attacks and that there is a massive cover-up to suppress the truth through the Zionism Regime.

These strong statements caused a dramatic reaction from the US, Britain, and many European delegates as they marched out of the meeting in disgust over the accusations while having total memory loss for what has been happening at home as millions of American citizens are waking up to the evidence surfacing and demanding an independent investigation. With a mainstream blackout occurring on the 9/11 issues arising, many Americans are left wondering why this dramatic walk-out happened when in fact Ahmadinejad was not the first to make these “US to blame” accusations and having total disregard for the citizens seeking answers to this truth.

Video by RussiaToday

Picture by SaidOnline

A True Weekly Rag


Stephanie Sledge

TheGovernmentRag

9/18/10

September 18, 2010 | A True Rag – Opinion

As the week passes, it is apparent to me that America is in far worse shape than I even imagined. This week, as the evidence broke about 9/11 when the Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth marched to Washington and presented the evidence that the Twin Towers and Bldg 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, hundreds of thousands of American citizen protesting in the streets over the outrageous lies and deceit that was fed to us by our government and mainstream. Well, while I am ragging about mainstream, did you witness any mainstream media coverage over this issue? I saw thousands of blogs and alternative media coverage but as usual, the corporate skunk mainstream media puppets are still mechanical robots to the powers to be feeding us more lies while telling the American citizens to shut up and go back to sleep because we don’t need to be concerned about what the Global Elitist Gods are doing.

On another Rag, this week the cover up continued with the British Petroleum (BP) oil spill as scientists find “slime highway” on the sea floor. That’s right, more cover up and shut up from the big business lords because what they say to the public through corrupt media is the truth and we better not even question it. If the Queen Bee says everything is fine – my, oh my, we just better listen. People, the Deep Water Horizon is over so go back to your caves and continue to buy your fuel from British Petroleum. After all, who cares about the fish kills going on of millions of fish, a slick oil scum on the ocean floor, the millions of gallons of Corexit they sprayed to sink the oil, the fishermen out of work, black crabs being served at the local grocery stores, and more drilling. If Lord BP says it is fine then just put your blinders back on and go back to your Mafia Wars.

Let’s not forget about the Rag earlier this week that Big Brother and the cell phone Lords are tracking, spying, and databasing your every move without total disregard for your privacy rights. I am beginning to witness sleeping Americans justify this by saying, ” oh – well, it’s for our own safety to be tracked and databased in case we are abducted by the human trafficking lords or we wreck our precious cars. Give me a break, wake the hell up and realize that you are trading your freedoms for security. Maybe the American citizens that don’t want to have freedom should move to a country where there is a heavy police state, far worse than the US and then you’ll be safe so long as you walk the fine line the “powers to be” want of you. As for the rest of America, I think people are just plain fed up with the tracking, databasing, stalking by criminal government, and corporate queens that want to feed their market data projections at any cost.

Next, as the Ancients warned, “He who controls the foods, controls the world.” Codex Alimentarius is going to be the death of millions, if not billions of men, women, and children all over the world. Legislation being pushed through will put our food into the hands of the criminal agencies that want nothing more than to control what the people eat while putting vitamins, minerals, herbs, and home remedies into the hands of the Pharma drug-dealers. This means more criminal penalties for the people. These agencies want to shut down the little farmers, make it illegal to grow a garden, and jail you for having cooking and healing herbs and minerals. It should not be a surprise the Pharma drug dealers will be making the cash crop off this – as everyone will have to get prescriptions to take vitamins. I guess what ever the Lords say then we should again just shut up and accept the things we cannot change. After all, God forbid we heal ourselves from cancer by simply detoxifying our toxic bodies with herbs that God gave us.

Lastly, marijuana busts, which are major cash crops for feeding the police stations in America by governmental luring of grants, are not enough so now the unconstitutional Sheriffs are want lists of patients that are on pain medication. I guess the banking cartel and powers to be want not only to be funded by the drugs that are sold through the pharma drug dealers – now they want more money to filter up the justice system into their hands by stepping up their homeland security operations to bring the hurting to a prison near you, sign on to a life of probation, and pay the hefty price. Don’t you love that while most of America was sleeping, the votes went out for the criminals on both sides of the false left-right paradigm that is accomplishing the mission of the New World Order? I often wonder when the majority of citizens will realize that when they run to the voting booth this November and click the button for right wingers (because they are sick of the left wingers) that they are still dumbed down and sleeping. I imagine most people will just vote for the opposite of the spectrum because they are dead set for being a sleeping sheeple so they can stick with the norm that feels good. It amazes me that people can’t just go to the booth and vote for the one that has the guts and record to work towards constitutional repairalism. I know for me, I am riding the storm with intentions of defeating this New World Order and all the criminals that have wrecked our economy by design, created modern-day Genocide programs through Eugenics, hijacked our government and justice system, and the ones kidnapping our children. Is it end times? I don’t know but we are what we imagine. If we want a country that is for freedom and liberties then get off your couch and beer and get to the streets to make the “change” necessary to restore our Bill of Rights and Constitution that is being stripped away before our eyes.

He Who Controls the Food, Controls the World


Stephanie Sledge

TheGovernmentRag

9/16/10

“He Who Controls the Food, Controls the World”

As the people were hijacked by the Gulf oil spill or perhaps still sleeping, the global elite made another move for total control of the world when President Obama/aka Barry Soetoro/aka Saebarkah signed Executive Order 13544. This order, that originates from the United Nations, mandates that the United States adopt Codex Alimentarius. This legislation is intended to bring an end to ALL vitamin and mineral supplements and natural health remedies and technologies. This bill gives control to the world’s pharmaceutical drug dealers and will allow them full control over the health of all individuals. This population control bill renders that all alternative health remedies “unscientific” and not provable by the FDA must be banned. Therefore, as the ancients warned, “he who controls the food chain, controls the world.”

In an opening session of this year’s Codex Alimentarius Commission meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Rima E. Laibow, MD, Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation shares her verbatim notes with the world on what the real stunning objectives and agenda are of the WHO, FAO, and Codex. In the following video, she explains the shocking plans that are in place to depopulate the world, genetically modify our human bodies, classify natural health supplements as toxins, and finally make it a criminal act to have herbs, vitamin and mineral supplements or alternative health remedies.  With cancer being the most profitable cash cow in the healthcare industry, the powers to be want to lower the standards of  nutrition and control who eats what, when, and where to keep the profits flowing.

MORE RELATED VIDEOS ON CODEX AND NEW WORLD ORDER PLANS TO CONTROL FOOD AND POPULATION

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM2pazke2To